Hope for HIE – Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy Hope for HIE – Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy

BLOG

Hype or Hope: Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT) & HIE

October 1st, 2025  | Advocacy  | News  | Research

 

HBOT: Breathing New Life Into the Brain… Or Blowing Hot Air?

You’ve likely seen the claims:

“We reversed brain damage with hyperbaric oxygen!”
“HBOT gave our child a second chance!”
“This is the miracle therapy your neurologist won’t tell you about!”

When your child has a diagnosis like HIE or cerebral palsy, and the medical team tells you there are no guarantees—or worse, no further treatments—it's only natural to keep searching.

But is Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT) a safe, effective and legitimate treatment for pediatric brain injury? Or is it another example of hype that overpromises and underdelivers? It seems to make sense on the surface, wouldn't pressurized oxygen at 100% be good for a hypoxic brain injury? Let's talk about it.


What is Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy?

Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT) is a medical treatment where a person breathes 100% oxygen in a pressurized chamber, typically 1.5 to 3 times the normal atmospheric pressure. This increases the amount of oxygen carried in the blood, which may support healing in certain injuries or infections.

Regulatory-Approved Uses for HBOT Include:

  • Carbon monoxide poisoning
  • Decompression sickness (“the bends” in divers)
  • Gas embolism
  • Diabetic foot ulcers and chronic wounds
  • Radiation injuries from cancer treatment
  • Certain infections, such as necrotizing fasciitis

HBOT is legitimately used worldwide, but only for specific, well-researched conditions. Regulatory agencies across countries have approved HBOT for a narrow list of indications.

Country/RegionApproved HBOT IndicationsRegulatory Body
United States14 approved conditions (e.g. carbon monoxide poisoning, gas embolism, diabetic foot ulcers, radiation injury)FDA, Undersea & Hyperbaric Medical Society (UHMS)
CanadaSimilar to U.S.; use limited to hospital-based settings for specific conditionsHealth Canada
UKApproved for decompression illness, gas embolism, soft tissue infections, etc.NHS, British Hyperbaric Association
AustraliaApproved for radiation injury, crush injuries, diabetic woundsTherapeutic Goods Administration (TGA)
Europe (varies)Some countries allow more flexible “off-label” use, but HIE and CP are not recognized indications by EMA or national agenciesEuropean Medicines Agency (EMA) and national regulators

Nowhere in the world is HBOT officially approved to treat cerebral palsy or hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE).

🔗 FDA: Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy—Get the Facts

⚠️ HBOT is not approved by any regulatory agency worldwide for treating cerebral palsy (CP) or neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE)—but it is often marketed for these conditions without sufficient evidence or oversight.


⚠️ The Hype

“HBOT heals damaged brain tissue.”
“It’s natural, safe, and worth trying.”
“It worked for someone else’s child—why not yours?”

Many private clinics, social media influencers, and alternative therapy networks promote HBOT directly to families, especially for cerebral palsy and HIE. These claims are not supported by rigourous science, and they take advantage of gaps in research and the emotional vulnerability of families facing lifelong diagnoses.


🧠 The Evidence: What Research Shows

For Cerebral Palsy:

Iona Novak’s research, including her systematic reviews and the “State of the Evidence Traffic Lights 2019,” classifies hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) as ineffective for improving motor function in children with cerebral palsy and recommends against its use due to lack of benefit and potential for harm, such as hearing loss and pain. This assessment is supported by the most recent high-quality randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews, which consistently show that HBOT does not provide greater improvements in motor or cognitive outcomes compared to pressurized air or standard therapies. Both HBOT and control groups typically show similar improvements, likely reflecting natural progression or placebo effects.

The largest multicenter RCT found no difference in gross motor function between HBOT and slightly pressurized air, with both groups improving modestly and similarly over the study period. Adverse events, particularly middle ear barotrauma, are more frequent with HBOT but are generally mild. Recent meta-analyses and systematic reviews confirm these findings and highlight the moderate evidence for increased adverse events with HBOT compared to controls.

While some re-analyses using the Gross Motor Function Measure Evolution Ratio (GMFMER) suggest greater progress with HBOT, these findings are confounded by methodological limitations and lack of appropriate controls.

Key Takeaways:

  • Randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews consistently show no added benefit of HBOT over pressurized air (placebo).
  • Improvements observed in both groups are likely due to concurrent therapies or increased attention, not HBOT.
  • The respected “Traffic Light” system by Iona Novak and colleagues classifies HBOT as “Red—Do Not Do” for CP, citing lack of benefit and risk of harm.

📚 Sources: [1,3,5,8–9]


For Neonatal HIE:

No ongoing or recently completed high-quality randomized controlled trials registered in major trial registries have demonstrated efficacy or safety of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) for neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE). For neonatal HIE, most clinical trials have been small, single-center studies with poor methodological quality and limited reporting. While some meta-analyses suggest HBOT may reduce mortality and neurological sequelae, these findings are undermined by lack of standardized protocols, inadequate randomization, absence of blinding, and insufficient long-term follow-up. No recent high-quality, CONSORT-adherent randomized controlled trials have established HBOT as effective or safe for neonatal HIE. The only intervention with robust evidence and guideline support for improving outcomes in neonatal HIE is therapeutic hypothermia.

  • HBOT has shown some potential in animal studies, but published human studies are low-quality, inconsistent, and poorly designed.
  • A 2024 review in Frontiers in Neurology concluded the evidence is not strong enough to recommend HBOT for newborns with HIE.
  • The only treatment backed by strong clinical trial data and global medical consensus is therapeutic hypothermia, which must begin within 6 hours after birth.

📚 Sources: [2–4,6–7,10–12]


⚠️ The Risks: Not Just Harmless Oxygen

HBOT is often marketed as “natural” or “non-invasive,” but it carries documented risks, especially in neurologically fragile children.

Fact: HBOT is linked to more side effects than standard treatments. The most common problem is middle ear barotrauma, which means pain or injury to the ear from pressure changes. This can happen in up to half of children receiving HBOT. Other side effects include ear discomfort, the need for ear tubes, and, less commonly, seizures. Mechanistically, HBOT can increase reactive oxygen species and alter neurotransmitter balance, lowering the seizure threshold.

The American Academy of Pediatrics and other experts highlight these risks and recommend against HBOT.

Known Adverse Effects Include:

  • Middle ear barotrauma (up to 50%) – pain, injury, sometimes requiring surgery
  • Need for ear tubes (myringotomy)
  • Seizures – especially in children with HIE or epilepsy
  • Claustrophobia and distress – particularly in preverbal or sensory-sensitive children
  • Fire and explosion risk – HBOT chambers use high-pressure oxygen; explosions have occurred, including several fatal accidents resulting in death of children and adults.

📚 Sources: [1,4,5,11]


Why Insurance (Globally) Doesn’t Cover HBOT for HIE or CP

Across most healthcare systems—public or private—HBOT is not covered for HIE or CP because:

  • It is not an approved indication under medical guidelines
  • It lacks consistent, high-quality evidence of benefit
  • It is classified as investigational or unproven
  • It carries clear risks with no demonstrated gains

In many countries, HBOT for CP or HIE is only offered in private clinics, often at $100–300 per session, with 20–40 sessions recommended—fully out-of-pocket.


✅ The Hope: Where to Focus

Real hope lies in treatments that are:

  • Evidence-based
  • Regulated and monitored
  • Child- and family-centered
  • Supported by medical guidelines

These include:

  • PT, OT, speech, and vision therapy
  • Seizure and spasticity management
  • Early intervention programs
  • Adaptive equipment and assistive tech
  • Participation in well-designed clinical trials with ethical oversight

🔎 References

  1. Laureau J, et al. PLOS ONE. 2022;17(10):e0276126. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0276126
  2. Sánchez-Rodríguez EC, et al. Front Neurol. 2024;15:1389703. doi:10.3389/fneur.2024.1389703
  3. Collet JP, et al. Lancet. 2001;357(9256):582–6. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04054-x
  4. FDA. Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy: Get the Facts. FDA Consumer Update
  5. Novak I, et al. State of the Evidence: Traffic Lights 2019. CP Alliance
  6. Matchett GA, et al. Neurol Res. 2009;31(2):114–21. doi:10.1179/174313209X389857
  7. Mielecki D, et al. Front Neurol. 2024;15:1386695. doi:10.3389/fneur.2024.1386695
  8. McDonagh MS, et al. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;49(12):942–7. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00942.x
  9. Liu X, et al. Brain Injury. 2025. doi:10.1080/02699052.2025.2514158
  10. Liu Z, et al. BMJ. 2006;333(7564):374. doi:10.1136/bmj.38776.731655.2F
  11. Hajek M, et al. Int J Med Sci. 2025;22(3):473–481. doi:10.7150/ijms.102884
  12. McAdams RM, Berube MW. J Perinatol. 2021;41(4):661–74. doi:10.1038/s41372-021-01022-9

 

SIGNUP

Connect with families, read inspiring stories, and get helpful resources delivered right to your inbox.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.