Hope for HIE – Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy Hope for HIE – Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy

BLOG

Communicating Uncertainty in HIE — A Primer for Clinicians

June 25th, 2026  | Care  | News

 


What families with HIE need from you when the honest answer is "wait and see"

There's a moment in almost every HIE journey when medicine runs out of certainty, or it never had it to begin with. And that's ok! Uncertainty isn't a failure. It's often where hope is found and anchored for families facing the "wait and see" with HIE.

That gap — between what the evidence can tell us and what families are left holding — is where communication does its most important work. Here's how to do it well.


The uncertainty is real, and it isn't going away

It helps to be honest with yourself first: HIE outcomes sit on a wide bell curve, and our prognostic tools, even the good ones, can only narrow it so far. And, it's not a personal or professional failure to accept this uncertainty.

Let's just say it, HIE is complex. It always has been, and it likely always will be.

No two injury patterns produce the same outcome. Causation is heterogeneous — sentinel events, in-utero factors, sudden unexpected postnatal collapse — and genetic overlap is small. Even advanced prognostic tools leave meaningful room for variation.

A recent analysis of automated EEG background and two-year outcomes (Cornet, Glass, et al., JAMA Network Open, 2025) put it plainly: because neurodevelopmental outcomes are shaped by the home environment, every prognostic tool will stay imperfect — which, the authors note, leaves "room for hope" for infants with HIE and their families.

That's the reframe worth carrying into the room. Uncertainty isn't a failure of your prognostication. It's an honest feature of the condition. And it can be the gateway to anchor families in realistic hope rather than false reassurance or premature despair.


Anchor what you know. Be honest about what you don't.

Families don't need you to predict the future. They need you to hold the uncertainty with them and give them something solid to stand on.

And there are tools that can help! We're outlining one, but there are several found in the resources and citations at the bottom of this post.

The ALIGN Framework — a parent-informed approach to prognostic communication for infants with neurologic conditions (Lemmon et al., Neurology, 2023) — is built around exactly this. It offers concrete language for naming what is reasonably certain while being transparent about what remains unknown. In practice, that means setting an anchor across the domains families will actually live with: motor, cognition, seizures, and vision and hearing. You can be honest that you don't know the magnitude of impact in each, while still being concrete about the range of what that domain can look like.

A few things that make this land:

Name the diagnosis out loud. Say HIE. Say the words families will be Googling at 2 a.m. anyway — cerebral palsy, epilepsy, CVI. A clear term they can carry is more humane than a vague "we're watching some things." Ambiguity doesn't protect families; it isolates them.

Be concrete about what outcomes can look like. Ask yourself what mental image a parent forms when they hear "cerebral palsy" to people who likely have not had much interaction with the disability community. For many, it's usually the most severe outcome picture that comes to mind. Fill in the real range — include how some kids may need assistance walking and that could look like orthotics, a walker, or a wheelchair, some may have just one arm impacted, some may have speech impacted and need speech therapy or use a device to communicate — so the term informs rather than terrifies.

Don't predict the whole life from the NICU. Most clinical trials and follow-up end at two or three years, where the outcome data (and the funding) usually stop. Families keep going for decades. Vision concerns at three months, a CP diagnosis at nine months, epilepsy onset at eight years, anxiety at ten — the journey unfolds long after your last visit, and later outcomes are very difficult to predict.

Know who you're talking to

Families don't cope in one way, and the parent in front of you is coping in a style shaped by their history, culture, and the resources they had in the moment.

Work mapping the HIE caregiver journey (Converse, Pilon, et al., presented at the International Newborn Brain Conference, 2023) and the clinical experience of our own social work team point to recognizable patterns.

High-Res Poster PDF

THE PHENOTYPES OF COPING WITH HIE

Some parents are information seekers, trying to regain control through data. Some are optimistic minimizers, surviving emotionally by staying forward-focused. Some are vigilant watchers, determined never to miss something critical again. Others are meaning makers, comparison seekers, present-focused survivors, or grief-dominant — each with a different underlying need.

Jennifer Schaefer, CAPSW, Hope for HIE social worker, developed this phenotype concept.

There is no right or wrong way to cope. But the way you deliver information should flex to meet it. The data-hungry parent needs sources and specifics. The grieving parent needs you to slow down and acknowledge loss before you offer a single statistic.


What families need to hear from you

Some things are true for nearly every family, and saying them out loud matters:

  • Guilt and shame are normal — no matter what brought them to the NICU. Naming that early gives parents permission to stop blaming themselves.
  • Two parents often cope in different styles and on different timelines, and they're usually unaware that this is common between them. A sentence acknowledging it can prevent months of partners feeling out of sync or alone.
  • Watch for bias of marginalized populations: Historically marginalized families, single parents and young parents frequently don't feel taken seriously. Watch for it, and correct for it.

And here's a reassurance worth offering explicitly, especially to families years down the road:


Don't let them leave alone

The single most concrete thing you can do at the end of a hard conversation is make sure the family doesn't walk out the way they came in.

Hand them a connection. Trauma-informed care includes "choice and voice" as well as "connection to peer support". Some families will opt into support right away, some later, and some may not. Connection to support gives families the empowerment in their journey of when and how they have support, but they need to know it exists first.

Hope for HIE offers support across every outcome, age, and impact: a credentialed social worker who can connect families to counseling and local resources, a certified child life specialist, weekly video support groups for newly diagnosed and loss families, trained 1:1 and on-call peer mentors, and a peer network of 100+ groups built since 2010. Families can start with a single intake form at HIE.support, and you can request support packages and printable materials for your NICU, PICU, or clinic below.

Request Materials

You will not always have answers. You will sometimes have to say "wait and see." But you can always say it in a way that names the diagnosis clearly, anchors what's known, honors how this particular family copes, and points them toward people who have been there.

Uncertainty is uncomfortable. How you communicate will be one of the most lasting things you'll give a family — long after they've left your unit.


The Journey Ahead

Many clinicians may only see and communicate with families facing HIE in the NICU or acute care setting. But, the acute care setting is the beginning of a lifetime journey with HIE, regardless of how HIE impacts the baby or child. This is why transparent, accurate and tailored communication is essential.

Jennifer Schaefer, CAPSW, Hope for HIE social worker, developed this post-acute coping journey concept.


Resources & Citations:

PROGNOSTIC COMMUNICATION FRAMEWORKS & APPROACHES

Lemmon ME, Barks MC, Bansal S, et al. The ALIGN framework: a parent-informed approach to prognostic communication for infants with neurologic conditions. Neurology. 2023;100(8):e800-e807. PMID: 36456199. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000201600

Racine E, Bell E, Farlow B, et al. The 'ouR-HOPE' approach for ethics and communication about neonatal neurological injury. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2017;59(2):125-135. PMID: 27915463. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.13343

Craig AK, Munoz-Blanco S, Pilon B, Lemmon M. Communicating with parents about therapeutic hypothermia and hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy: integrating a palliative care approach into practice. Clin Perinatol. 2024;51(3):711-724. PMID: 39095105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clp.2024.04.009

Cawley P, Chakkarapani E. Fifteen-minute consultation: therapeutic hypothermia for infants with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy — translating jargon, prognosis and uncertainty for parents. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2020;105(2):75-83. PMID: 31292147. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2017-314116

HIE AND NEONATAL ENCEPHALOPATHY: THE PARENT EXPERIENCE

Sagaser A, Pilon B, Goeller A, Lemmon M, Craig AK. Parent experience of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy and hypothermia: a call for trauma informed care. Am J Perinatol. 2024;41(5):586-593. PMID: 35026852. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1739-3388

Pilon B, Craig AK, Lemmon ME, Goeller A. Supporting families in their child's journey with neonatal encephalopathy and therapeutic hypothermia. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021;26(5):101278. PMID: 34561175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.siny.2021.101278

Lemmon ME, Donohue PK, Parkinson C, Northington FJ, Boss RD. Parent experience of neonatal encephalopathy. J Child Neurol. 2017;32(3):286-292. PMID: 27932597. https://doi.org/10.1177/0883073816680747

Grass B, Erlach M, Rathke V, Cippa G, Hagmann C, Brotschi B. Parents' experiences of therapeutic hypothermia for neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE): a single-center cross-sectional study. Qual Manag Health Care. 2024;33(2):94-100. PMID: 37482641. https://doi.org/10.1097/QMH.0000000000000414

FAMILY-CENTERED CARE & FAMILIES AS PARTNERS IN NEONATAL NEURO-CRITICAL CARE

Bansal S, Molloy EJ, Rogers E, et al. Families as partners in neonatal neuro-critical care programs. Pediatr Res. 2024;96(4):912-921. PMID: 38886506. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-024-03257-6

Guez-Barber D, Pilon B. Parental impact during and after neonatal intensive care admission. Semin Perinatol. 2024;48(5):151926. PMID: 38964994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semperi.2024.151926

Sewell E, Dingman A, Bonifacio S, Guez-Barber D, Pilon B, Smyser C. Building a neonatal neurocritical care program: a practical guide to initial implementation. Neoreviews. 2025;26(11):e755-e772. PMID: 41173295. https://doi.org/10.1542/neo.26-11-069

Gançarski L, Langlet-Muteau C, Rondel J, Escande B, Koenig-Zores C, Kuhn P. Physiological and behavioral stability of newborns on therapeutic hypothermia for hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy during parental holding. Pediatr Res. 2025;98(4):1283-1289. PMID: 39821131. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-025-03812-9

SHARED DECISION-MAKING IN THE NICU

Soltys F, Philpott-Streiff SE, Fuzzell L, Politi MC. The importance of shared decision-making in the neonatal intensive care unit. J Perinatol. 2020;40(3):504-509. PMID: 31570796. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-019-0507-6

Weiss EM, Barg FK, Cook N, Black E, Joffe S. Parental decision-making preferences in neonatal intensive care. J Pediatr. 2016;179:36-41.e3. PMID: 27665039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.08.030

Richards CA, Starks H, O'Connor MR, Bourget E, Hays RM, Doorenbos AZ. Physicians' perceptions of shared decision-making in neonatal and pediatric critical care. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018;35(4):669-676. PMID: 28990396. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049909117734843

Pellikka HK, Axelin A, Sankilampi U, Kangasniemi M. Shared responsibility for decision-making in NICU: a scoping review. Nurs Ethics. 2023;30(3):462-476. PMID: 36688269. https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330221134948

PARENTAL TRAUMA, DISTRESS & TRAUMA-INFORMED CARE

Rent S, Lemmon ME, Ellestad S, Bidegain M. The role of perinatal palliative care in fetal neurology. Am J Perinatol. 2023;40(12):1265-1271. PMID: 34710944. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1682-2798

Cortezzo DE, Vawter-Lee M, Shoaib A, Venkatesan C. Role of palliative care in fetal neurological consultations: guiding through uncertainty and hope. Front Pediatr. 2023;11:1205543. PMID: 37334218. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2023.1205543

Lin M, Williams D, Vitcov G, et al. Advance care planning and parent-reported end-of-life outcomes in the neonatal intensive care unit. Am J Perinatol. 2024;41(S 01):e1657-e1667. PMID: 37116531. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768488

PALLIATIVE CARE, GOALS OF CARE & END-OF-LIFE COMMUNICATION

Sabnis A, Fojo S, Nayak SS, Lopez E, Tarn DM, Zeltzer L. Reducing parental trauma and stress in neonatal intensive care: systematic review and meta-analysis of hospital interventions. J Perinatol. 2019;39(3):375-386. PMID: 30659239. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-018-0310-9

Sanders MR, Hall SL. Trauma-informed care in the newborn intensive care unit: promoting safety, security and connectedness. J Perinatol. 2018;38(1):3-10. PMID: 28817114. https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2017.124

Loewenstein K. Parent psychological distress in the neonatal intensive care unit within the context of the social ecological model: a scoping review. J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2018;24(6):495-509. PMID: 29577790. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078390318765205

Hansen K, Davis P, Hubbard DK. Trauma informed care in the neonatal intensive care unit. J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2023;19(4):326-335. PMID: 37768195. https://doi.org/10.1080/15524256.2023.2262155

Source: PubMed. Citation years reflect the journal volume/issue of record; for articles published online ahead of print, the DOI link resolves to the definitive version. This is a starting reference set, not an exhaustive systematic search.

Printable Resource List

 

SIGNUP

Connect with families, read inspiring stories, and get helpful resources delivered right to your inbox.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.